Explaining the Federal Government Shakedown

Last week, Democrats faced a critical choice: force a government shutdown to extract concessions from Republicans or pass a stopgap funding bill to keep agencies running. With the GOP in turmoil, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer opted for compromise, sparking fierce debate within his party.

A Continuing Resolution (CR) is a temporary government funding bill that extends current spending levels without policy changes or additional provisions. It is typically used to prevent a shutdown while lawmakers negotiate a broader budget deal. Instead of a clean CR, Republicans attached conservative policy riders, including cuts to social programs and border security measures catering to the far right. These changes forced Democrats to choose between negotiating or risking a shutdown.

Schumer and nine other Democrats voted for the CR, keeping the government open. Since then, he has faced fierce criticism for not securing concessions in return. Let’s briefly walk through the decision.

The Case for Shutting the Government Down

Many Democrats argued that a government shutdown was the best way to force concessions from Republicans while exposing their dysfunction. With the GOP in disarray, Democrats had rare leverage to demand funding for Ukraine, social programs, or undo DOGE cuts. A shutdown could have also highlighted the extremism of Trump-aligned Republicans, who have repeatedly shown they cannot govern responsibly. Had they held firm, Democrats could have forced moderate Republicans to choose between working across the aisle or continuing to enable MAGA chaos.

The Case for Passing the Continuing Resolution

Democrats who supported the CR argued that shutting down the government would hurt ordinary Americans more than Republicans. They emphasized that federal workers would lose their paychecks, social services would shut down, and economic uncertainty could play into Trump’s hands.

Schumer warned that a government shutdown would be more devastating than a Republican CR, giving Trump, Musk, and DOGE the power to decide which agencies remain open. Unlike a CR, which allows court challenges to executive orders, a shutdown leaves the executive branch with unchecked power. In doing so, Republicans’ goal of dismantling federal agencies would accelerate, cutting essential services like veterans’ offices, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and SNAP. 

Bottom Line? Passing the CR kept the government running, ensured funding for key programs, and prevented Democrats from facing blame for dysfunction. But, it also allowed Trump and Musk to continue doing as they please, with the courts acting as minor speed bumps, at best.

Where Do Democrats Go From Here?

With the CR passed, Democrats must refocus on the bigger fight: countering Trump’s authoritarian movement and the billionaire-backed forces seeking to dismantle government institutions. Instead of relying on traditional negotiations, they must take a more aggressive stance—exposing GOP failures, mobilizing voters, and using every tool available to block Republican sabotage. 

The next budget battle is looming, and Democrats cannot afford to give away leverage again. Instead, they must prepare to fight smarter, knowing that the GOP’s endgame isn’t governance—it’s destruction.

5 Ways Kemp & Trump are Failing Georgia

1. CDC Layoffs: Rightsizing at Whose Expense?

The decision to cut 10% of the CDC’s Atlanta workforce (nearly 1,300 jobs) is a significant blow to workers and public health. Governor Kemp has voiced his support for the move, insisting that “government can stand a little rightsizing.” Yet, for employees who are losing their jobs amid rising living costs, this so-called “rightsizing” feels more like a betrayal.

Beyond the immediate toll on workers, these layoffs weaken the CDC’s ability to conduct research and respond to health crises like the current Norovirus and bird flu outbreaks. The question remains: who truly benefits from these cuts, and at what long-term cost?

2. Denied Hurricane Relief: Leaving Georgia to Fend for Itself

After Hurricane Helene devastated parts of Georgia, Kemp requested $100 million in federal aid. However, the Trump administration denied Georgia’s request to give local governments more time to apply for federal disaster assistance. 

Rather than pushing back against this decision, Kemp quietly backed down. Although he claims to be “fighting hard” for storm victims, his inaction has forced devastated communities to fend for themselves. Disaster victims shouldn’t have to depend on charity because their leaders refuse to step up. Georgia deserves better.

3. Medicaid Work Requirements: Healthcare for the Few, Not the Many

Kemp marketed the “Pathways to Coverage” program as an alternative Medicaid expansion, but it came with strict work requirements that disqualified thousands. 18 months in, only 6,500 people are enrolled—a fraction of the estimated 370,000 uninsured Georgians who could benefit.

Instead of fully expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, Kemp continues to embrace Trump-style restrictions that make coverage harder to access. If Republicans succeed at their long-term goal of cutting Medicaid, low-income families, seniors, and people with disabilities will have even fewer options for affordable healthcare.

4. Immigration Crackdowns: ICE Raids & Labor Shortages

As Trump escalates deportations, Kemp has allowed ICE to carry out aggressive raids that separate families and remove vital members of our communities. This not only inflicts emotional and financial hardship on affected families but also weakens Georgia’s economy, heavily dependent on immigrant labor.

Take Georgia’s construction industry, for example—76% of companies are struggling to find workers despite the sector contributing $45 billion to the state’s economy. Instead of addressing this crisis, Kemp is doubling down on enforcement. On March 17th, Kemp asked ICE to train all 1,100 Georgia State Patrol Troopers in immigration enforcement, further instilling fear among immigrant communities. 

5. Destroying Education: Slashing Budgets, Hurting Students

Trump’s plan to dismantle the Department of Education would strip federal oversight, jeopardizing support for students with disabilities, low-income families, and unhoused children. Without these protections, educational inequities would deepen, limiting opportunities for the most vulnerable students.

Meanwhile, Kemp and GOP lawmakers have ramped up efforts to put more money into school vouchers by cutting funding from state agencies in charge of schools, prisons, and social services. With teacher shortages and outdated materials already straining public schools, diverting funds will hit low-income and rural districts the hardest. Coupled with Trump’s cuts, Georgia’s education system is on a path to deeper decline.

Ways to Get Involved